Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts

Our experiments with Unschooling

This article was published in Teacher Plus in January 2016 and is  available here

http://www.teacherplus.org/2016/january-2016/our-experiments-in-unschooling

Our experiments in unschooling

4 January 2016 One Comment
Ramgopal K
“….. human violence, greed, laziness, and all the other sins are not an ugly human nature breaking through the safeguards of moral training and self-control, but the opposite. They are the result of denying human nature, which is essentially loving, creative, empathetic, caring… in a word, divine.”Charles Eisenstien
Since the time we decided to ‘unschool’ (which is what we choose to call what we do) our kids, we have had a myriad reactions to our decision. Ranging from outright shock and anger with us combined with pity for our kids, puzzlement, and diplomatic rejection to genuine concern and eager curiosity. There have been a variety of questions around this move. So I thought it is perhaps best to organize this article as a response to the questions we get asked.
First, I think it’s best to start with what we mean by unschooling – like many other terms connected with ‘education’ (oops, that itself is such a contested word!) ‘unschooling’ means different things to different people.
What is unschooling to us?
Unschooling for us has meant a learning that is self-driven and self-chosen that comes from active participation in natural living experiences. We try to leave the children largely to themselves to choose what they want to pursue and how they wish to pursue it. There is very little in terms of a predetermined structure or curriculum that is imposed. The ‘learning’ happens as part of the day-to-day living. They actively participate in the household chores – cooking, fixing stuff at home, working on farms, whenever we are on one, and making decisions to the extent that they are able to. When they have questions around something that comes up during the course of the day, we discuss them, refer to books or research on the Internet to study it further. Whenever we think there is a need to regulate or make a choice for them, we suggest it to them and attempt to arrive at a certain agreed norm collectively. For example, the regulation of screen time (movie, computer time) or learning of Telugu and mathematics. Besides this they pursue music and various hand crafts.
Why unschooling?
The understanding of how we want to raise our children and the choices around their education has evolved along with our own process of seeking a more meaningful and fulfilling life. It started with my quitting my corporate career, because I was frustrated with it and never really enjoyed it. I found my calling in teaching and working with kids. I was involved in teaching at and running a small alternative learning centre, founded and run by Gurveen Kaur, called Centre for Learning (CFL) in Hyderabad. CFL was a place that nurtured active reflective thinking and experimentation in learning, teaching. There was an ongoing engagement to think about how education could be fun and personally meaningful. And this question was always posed in the larger context of a more sustainable, fairer, and freer society. Our children went to CFL until last year and us parents have been involved with CFL as teachers, volunteers, and parents since 2007.
It was during this time that I was also exposed to work around human rights, social movements, and the impact of what we have come to see as “development” on the lives of other people and the environment. We had also come to spend a lot of time living and working with a friend who lived with very basic amenities on a small farm away from the city.
These experiences dismantled a lot of learning and assumptions that I had come to have and gave me a fresh perspective on work, learning and living, and the idea of a good life. Some of which I summarize below.
I realized from my teaching experience with children that one of the most preposterous and tragic myths of modern schooling is that a child needs to be in a closed space five days a week, nine months a year for ten years packed together with other children of the same age, being told all the time what to learn, and how to learn and being monitored constantly to learn all that they learn at school!
Even granting that what they learn is worthwhile (which is highly contestable), whatever is learnt can easily be learnt in far less stressful ways with a lot of fun, in far less time and without all the control and threat mechanisms that a schooling process uses.
This environment that pushes things down on children firstly kills any joy for learning. It utterly disregards the child as an active learner, who has his/her own questions to pursue, in his/her own way and pace. Since all that is to be learnt is decided from afar by a set of adults and administered at a pre scheduled time and pace, studying becomes a chore that is clearly demarcated from play. Very early, we are conditioned to think of play as being wasteful and that learning cannot be playful or that there is even any learning in play. After a few years in school, learners seldom study because of their own motivation, they study for exams, for certificates or when coerced to do so with threats or rewards. Do you remember reading a science textbook in your free time? Have you ever seen a school going child do that? Given the choice, children would watch TV or go out and play.
We also realized that what is recognized as knowledge or worth knowing is extremely narrow in school. The best of schools probably teach academics well, but anything beyond it is either “extra curricular” or given token symbolism, with the occasional workshop or two – handicrafts, tailoring, maintenance and repair of your cycle – does any school put the child who is interested and does this with great skill and interest above one who does well in a written academic test? Does any school nurture a student who wants to be a gardener or a farmer?
children-with-father Children, when left to themselves, enjoy the ‘extra curricular’ activities and will even perhaps choose to pursue these more seriously if they are not subtly (through the grade system, segregation) and explicitly (through admonishments) discouraged from doing them.
We felt that staying out of school would in fact give our kids the opportunity of a wider exposure to things beyond academics. It leaves children with more time to experiment, have far more diverse real life experiences and social interactions.
So when we decided to move out of the city to live on a farm, it was a natural decision for us to stay out of school. However this was not an arbitrary decision that we took. We spent time discussing this with the children and they know that if at any point they want to go to a school, they have the freedom to make that choice.
How do they spend their time?
The experiment with unschooling began with our attempt to move out of the city to a village to live there and work on a farm. Our children had the company of two other kids who were also around their age and didn’t go to school. A large part of their time was spent in play. They would spend time coming up with games, formulate their own rules and then improvize them as they went along. They would accompany us to the farm. Sometimes choosing to help us in our work, sometimes doing something on their own.
Over the four months that we stayed there they would from time to time help us in the construction of the mud house that we were involved in – mixing mud, plastering walls, sieving sand. Besides this they would sometimes lend us a hand with harvesting, sowing seeds, planting trees, watering plants, etc. Being on a farm they frequently encountered snakes, scorpions, lizards, and birds. That would prompt them to read about these creatures using field guides to identify snakes, tell the venomous ones from the non-venomous ones. etc.
As a practice, we never deliberately kept the kids out of any of our real life issues, unless we felt it would be disturbing for them to handle. In the course of our time there, we had issues with the neighbouring farmers for access, for which we had to engage with government departments. The children would be part of the brainstorming we had, accompany us to the collectorate office, be part of our conversations. On another occasion we had to engage with illegal granite mining on a hill close to the farm. So they would listen to our conversations about the impact of the mining, hear us discuss possible ways to handle it, see us meet people in the village, talk about petitioning, etc. If I had to slot these experiences into different subjects it would be social studies (understanding village social setups, government bureaucracy functions), ecology and environment science (food chain, diversity, natural farming, use of solar energy, impact of mining on environment), biology (plants, animals, anatomy, reproduction) …as you can see, the list of subjects is endless and the learning was seamless.
Since we moved back to Hyderabad from the village, they spend three days at an informal resource centre to which a few other home schooled children go. There they get to take up self-initiated projects, pursue study on chosen themes, and take up group projects. Depending on the resource people coming in they get to choose to learn dance, art, craft, theater, etc.
On the other days in the week they are home. Sometimes when we go to work on a friend’s farm they accompany us and spend time there, else they use the time in reading, visiting a library, or pursuing practical projects around tailoring, crochet, craft using Internet to research and learn. When we travel to conduct workshops or work on a farm, they travel with us and are participating in ways that make sense to them.
The only scheduled learning that we do is mathematics once in a couple of weeks and some reading practice in Telugu. Mathematics because, while some of it gets handled during the course of the work we do, some of it doesn’t and they have enjoyed doing math when they went to Centre for Learning. Telugu because, while they are fluent in English and read it, there is never an opportunity to engage with too much Telugu literature in the normal course and we feel if they are at least equipped with the reading skills they can later always take off from there if they want to.
What about the company of other kids?
This is a very frequent concern that people express. That if children do not go to school, they are going to miss out on socializing with other kids their age. We found that while children do like to have other children to interact with, this can easily be organized outside school. Meeting kids over play in the evening, visiting friends, meeting other home schooling kids and during travel to other places. However, we feel that the need to be with other kids of the same age is rather over estimated. Children can very comfortably relate to people of varied age groups. It’s only when adults treat a child condescendingly or when they talk down to them that the relationship doesn’t become a meaningful one. Otherwise they can have quite an active, stimulating friendship going with older people. In any case in a school the children are all grouped according to age and so a child is almost always spending time with children of only her/his age, which is rather restricting. And this interaction too is very strongly mediated by adults most times. Not having to be in school every day for 5-7 hours frees up a lot of time for interactions with people in other forums like art and dance classes, workshops, common interest groups, etc.
What about academic subjects like science, mathematics, social studies?
While we plan time for the children to do mathematics and practice Telugu reading, we don’t really see the need to do the others as structured subjects as yet, since ideas, concepts around these subjects come up anyway during the course of our work. Whenever they have a question around a certain topic, we pick up books to refer to or research on the Internet.
For example, when we had a snake in our backyard, they got quite interested in knowing how to identify snakes, recognizing venomous snakes, responding to snake bites, etc. They picked up a Field Guide by Romulus Whitaker and read it with great interest and excitement. When they wanted to know how a petrol engine works, we talked about chemical reactions and from there went on to talking about elements, atoms, and molecules since they needed this to understand chemical reactions.
So in short, topics from science, social studies are learnt when questions around them come up organically during the course of their exploring life. And this way they have never treated them as boring subjects with boundaries.
What are the challenges of unschooling?
For one, we had to acknowledge and accept that we (the parents) ourselves are schooled in many ways. So there are times when there is insecurity and anxiety. This cannot be a ‘method’ that we choose to impose on our kids. This is a process where the parents have to be collectively involved with the kids, constantly engaging in a dialogue in what we are doing with them, so that they are not just being handed down decisions but are a part of the choices we make.
Many a times we instinctively talk down to them, or don’t trust them enough to leave them to themselves to pursue their paths on some issues. So we realize it is as much a journey for us as parents where we need to reflect on our own conditioning constantly and attempt to do that transparently with the kids.
And given that there are not very many precedents around you, sometimes we are uncertain and hence anxious. However, there is a big enough community of people spread across the country who are taking to this path and building connections with them gives a sense of solidarity.
What reassures us is the active engagement the kids have in what they do and learn and since they choose to do it, there are no hard lines between play and learning. And they are doing it with joy, not with the burden of an external assessment.
What’s the future? What will they do without certificates?
At this point we haven’t really thought about or chartered a clear plan for the future. It is possible that they might want to go to a school when they grow up a little and we will find them a school at that point. If we feel that getting a certification is needed there is NIOS (National Institute of Open Schooling) where one can register for 10th class certificate examination. There are other options too like IGCSE, which offers certification options for self-learners.
However at this point we are not very anxious about certification, since we have seen a lot of people pursue their passions, find work without the need for certifications.
Unschooling is a path, where the parents need to be open to unlearn, reflect and submit themselves and their long held beliefs to examination. This also means that we examine fundamentally our own work, lifestyle, learning and values. There is no clear manual for going ahead, we need to, along with our children, figure our way as we go along, which means that we cannot use authority to impose things and must be open to acknowledging mistakes to the children and correcting ourselves.
Some interesting resources from which we have drawn understanding and inspiration for our journey.
  1. How children fail – John Holt
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0fgtvbMT7k – This movie of around 20 minutes explores possibilities for learning and living with a paradigm of Trust.
  3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUoYAj7Nosg – A short movie, critically examining the levels of institutionalization of our lives and its implications.
The author is primarily a home maker. He also spends his time participating in initiatives towards ‘Degrowth’, working on permaculture/natural farming based farms, documenting health impacts of nuclear power, campaigns for sustainability, and workshops on ecology. He also engages in theatre with children. He can be reached at knramgopal@gmail.com.

Self Assessment at CFL

As the first term this year drew to a close and most schools were busy conducting examinations – many of them squeezing in two exams a day to make up for the unexpected loss of working days, we at Centre for Learning, Hyderabad, got down to our almost week-long exercise of self-assessments with the children. Almost a week spent by the children (mostly 10 years and above) and teachers huddled in a room just talking can seem to an outsider as a gross waste of time, when there is so much of the “syllabus” still to be covered, and so much time has already been lost due to various bandhs. But these exercises remind me, as they always have time and again, how amazingly self-reflective and honestly self-critical children can be when we repose faith in them.Not just that, they are also capable of providing the teacher some insightful feedback and criticism.
The assessment exercise usually starts with one of the teachers introducing the children to the exercise we were doing. For the benefit of the newer children, she gives a few broad guidelines for looking back at the term – some of the key aspects that are suggested for each academic subject are understanding of concepts, coverage, interest, and confidence level in the particular area, effort, and feeddback on the respective teachers. In addition, there are some overall aspects like learnings that were personally important/exciting, behaviour, attitude, and level of responsibility shown. They are of course free to say anything else that they wish to about the term they just completed. Children are reminded that they are to measure their achievements against their own efforts and not compare themselves with others. After the initial and minimal introduction to the exercise, it is left open to the children to start off, in no particular order but leaving it to them to decide when each of them would like to take the turn to speak. Usually, children who have been longer with the Centre and have done this exercise a few times in the past, start off, as they know that they can speak their mind here without being judged. The newer children, with a little time and when they see the others speaking candidly, open up, if not the first time, very often, after a few sessions like this. Engaging with children to look at their own work and attitudes is a continous process through the daily routine. However, a milestone activity like this affords a different kind of space in two ways. One, since it is not related to an immediate task, or a particular behaviour that the learner has been involved in, there is a little more objectivity and a lesser need to be defensive. Secondly, as it is a collective exercise, seeing others look at themselves, makes children feel more secure in doing it themselves, and also helps them see that failure and weaknesses, are acceptable and not shameful to admit.
library
In the group of 8-12 year olds, Radhika who is 9, turning the pages of her English notes, felt, spellings was one area that she needed to work on. One 8 year-old felt he needed more practice in division. Giving their criticism on the teachers, a 9 year old said, “Although your handwriting on the board has improved, your writing in the books is still too difficult for me to understand,” – (the ‘still’ was because she had told me not to use running handwriting in the last couple of assessment sessions too!). And as another 10 year-old said, “Sometimes when you are angry with one of us, you also tend to show that anger with others”. Both these criticisms I had to accept as true, when I thought about them.
Anthony, a 15 year-old, who has been in and out of the Centre a few times, talked of how on the one side, he really wanted to study and would resolve to do his work at home, and how once he reached home, he would get totally overwhelmed by the urge to watch TV, or to go out with his friends and then would come back very late. Talking about his significant learnings in the term, he mentions the visit to the cancer hospital and says, “I know all the bad effects of smoking, but I still somehow cannot stop smoking totally”. We talk about his problem with TV and friends and how we could together overcome it and think of a few ideas that we would try out – including his coming to a teacher’s home to do an hour of study time with her.
Clara, a 13 year-old, feels she hasn’t made any progress at all this term. With stark honesty, she admits that sometimes she just gets very bored with most of the academic subjects and then the quality of her work slips. When asked what interests her, she mentions dance and embroidery.
As we go along, we came to know that Arun feels his interest in math has gone up this term, but still doesn’t feel very confident, he also thinks he gets into fights and scuffles much less now compared to last year, Navya is satisfied with her progress and thinks she has put in her best efforts. She loved her dance and singing, Rajesh and Suresh enjoyed compering for the Independence Day and enjoyed dancing on the stage for the first time in their lives.
At the end of the sessions, we not only had an idea of how the children felt about their progress in academics, but also about what excited them, what kept them from doing their best, situations at home, their interests, and what they thought about their attitudes.
Examinations are useful tools of assessment. If designed well, they do help to evaluate a learner’s understanding and to some extent application of their knowledge. However, they still can only throw light on WHAT the learner doesn’t know. They are limited in scope in answering the question, WHY has the learner been unable to learn what is expected in the examination, and treat the learner as a black box, in the sense that it just measures the output (read: performance of the learner) with respect to the input that she has got in the classroom in a particular period. Self-assessments, on the other hand, provide insights to the teacher into the learner as a person, her motivations, interests, what is personally meaningful to the learner and the different persona within that person and also help the learner become more self aware, which in itself is a valuable end.
For an exercise like this to be truly meaningful in an educational space, it demands that the role of teaching itself moves radically – from treating it as a job of efficient delivery of a present syllabus to that of a sensitive, caring, critical thinking, dialectic engagement with learners – from a 9 to 5 job to that of an act of love. Otherwise, an Anthony’s situation can be quickly dismissed as one of individual irresponsibility and utter waywardness instead of seeing him as a product of his circumstances and context, and also seeing that side of him attempting to overcome his situation, weak, but still alive and trying! Clara’s frankness in admitting to boredom in most of academics can easily be dismissed as sheer indolence (which is a possibility but not a certainty!), without raising deeper questions on the epistemic skewedness of what we deem as important knowledge – marginalizing and devaluing crafts and almost glamourizing the intellectual.
For an educational space that genuinely believes that a learner-teacher relationship can be democratic and is seriously committed to helping learners become self-motivated and independent learners, self assessment is not only a very important evaluation exercise, but is, in itself a direct and important learning activity towards the achievement of curricular aims.
As we bade goodbye to the children and prepared to leave for the holidays, I wondered if Anthony would survive the battles inside himself and still come back after the holidays … and wondered what to do with this girl named Clara… or rather what can we do that makes sense to her too! But the worry about the incomplete syllabus bothered me too…
(Names of the children have been changed to protect their identities)

Why do we ask why

This article was published in Teacher Plus and is available here
http://www.teacherplus.org/2009/july-2009/why-do-we-ask-why
In teaching and learning, questions are a regularly used tool… Teachers use ‘Why’ questions with children as young as 5 years. But what do we want to teach the children through these questions?
In most classrooms today, children are given the answers to standard questions and are made to learn (read memorise) the answer. For a question like ‘Why do we have a bath every day?”, the teacher might give children the answer , ‘We have a bath to keep ourselves clean and tidy and stay healthy’. The child passively accepts and memorises this and reproduces it when asked, either orally or in writing. Now for this child an answer that says, ‘We have a bath to stay fresh’ is not valid because it has not been handed down from the teacher – the authority for knowledge. So one has killed an opportunity for the child to think on her own and decide, on the merit of what is said whether the response is valid or not. Worse still we are conveying to the child that there is just one valid reason for having a bath and that any other reason cannot exist or is unacceptable.
why Questions like why we have a bath daily don’t have one right answer; of course any answer also may not be right. But there can be many reasons for one to have a bath. By giving a standard answer to the child to memorise; at best the child is learning a few spellings. The child is also learning that only what the teacher gives is right, and there is only one correct answer to a question and that they can’t with the knowledge they have express their own ideas – they need to depend on the teacher to hand them the right answer. Or that there may be many reasons, but in school this is what ought to be said/written. Is this what we want the child to learn?
Encouraging children to think and write their own answers expands the learning possibilities. For one, they are thinking on their own, rather than passively expecting an adult to give them THE ONE RIGHT ANSWER. Then they are expressing on their own, which means that they are learning to use their vocabulary and their knowledge of sentence construction to make meaning and give expression. What can be more exciting for a learner than to know that she is able to make use of what she has learnt!! And what is written is HER OWN CREATION – it helps the child believe in her ability to think, reason and use her knowledge to give expression to her idea. That is a very important learning. Even a spelling like ‘stadi’ (for study) – which is so obviously wrong, when looked at carefully might actually suggest progress for a child who has just started learning the sounds of letters, because ‘stadi’ is a perfectly legitimate phonic construction! The child has understood the phonic logic, now she only has to learn that the English language has its idiosyncrasies.
Responses from children can give a rich insight into their thinking worlds to the teacher. These responses can become the starting point for a discussion on the topic. Listening to answers from others and reasoning about their validity allows the child to think beyond her initial answer and broadens her own understanding of the concept/issue. After the discussion, the teacher can now ask the children to rewrite their answers. This kind of a participative exercise enriches learning.
Learning to think for oneself, learning to give expression to one’s own idea and appreciating that there can be many possible valid responses to a given question are more valuable learning objectives than presenting well-memorised, perfect-looking sentences.

A review of 'Teacher' by Sylvia Ashton Warner

This article was pubished in Teacher Plus, and is available here http://www.teacherplus.org/2008/september-2008/where-the-child-is-the-resource


Teacher
is an autobiographical account by Sylvia Ashton Warner about her teaching experience of over 20 years – between 1938 and 1954. It is relevant to note her own background as a child and later, to appreciate the ideas that she proposes as a part of the book. She was born into a family of nine children. Her father was crippled with arthritis and so the family was dependent on the mother, a teacher, who taught in remote rural schools to make a living. She was often at odds with the educational authorities. Warner’s accounts seem to suggest that she had a childhood with not many friends, and not a very pleasant schooling experience. Her siblings and the natural world around seem to be the sources of her interaction. Her work which largely reflects a fantasy world and highly romanticised language perhaps come out of this time spent alone with nature.
Ms. Warner was not a teacher by choice. She wanted to become an artist or a writer and felt teaching would limit her creative aspirations. She took to teaching to earn a living.
The book, Teacher, was published in 1963 many years after she retired as a teacher. The book captures her experience in teaching Maori children in State- run schools in New Zealand. It’s a book about an unorthodox teaching effort, written in a rather unorthodox style as a ‘write it as it comes’ narrative, presenting her ideas and approach to teaching interspersed with classroom conversations and other tidbits. Embedded in the often sentimental and romanticised narrative are some very powerful ideas of the author.
Key vocabulary
The key concept in the book is ‘organic teaching’. Warner believes that children’s natural energies and urges should form the source of pedagogy. She contends that externally prepared and induced efforts stunt the child’s creativity and can often be alienating and uninteresting to the child.
Warner’s attempts at evolving an unconventional pedagogy was a response to what she saw as ‘lifeless’ and uninteresting content and methods in use at the time.. She proposes that the child’s imagination and the ‘inner world’ should form the basis for building a child’s language and vocabulary. She sees the mind of a 5 year old as a ‘Volcano with two vents, one of destructiveness and one of creativity’. The more the child is allowed to use the creative vent, the less destructive the child will get. Dance, music and art find an important place in this approach. There is a strong Freudian influence in her proposition that the key vocabulary of a child is around two key instincts – Fear and Sex.
Warner’s ideas force one to stand up and look at the creative energies that a child brings to the educational space and the rich potential that these have – It reminds one of the Fukaokian concept of ‘do nothing’ farming – the power of nature and natural forces for creation. But, can this approach be readily applied in our own contexts.
Warner worked with a Maori tribe, which lived in their own villages with a distinctive culture. From this book and other accounts, the habitations and the school itself was located amidst rich and beautiful natural surroundings.In a way, the settings were much more natural than what is available as an environment to modern school children especially in India. So, the big question is how natural is natural? Can we, despite the setting, carry the romantic notion that all energy that a child exhibits is ‘natural’ and ‘organic’?
Or is there, because of the situation we are in, a need for more external inputs to correct and counter these influences? If societal influences are conservative, highly casteist, gender-biased, is there no need for using external means, through consciously designed content and use of symbolism to let children question these?
Natural farming is possible when the land still has the capacity to be regenerative, and there is the necessary flora and fauna to keep the natural processes active. If modernity has abused land with repeated use of chemicals and the ecology around has been destroyed to eliminate the local flora and fauna can we really leave the repair to nature? Or are some minimal interventions needed?
Playing the role of a teacher
Starting off reluctantly, she goes on to be a very intensely involved and empathetic teacher who goes beyond the classroom to understand the culture and the ethos of the children’s lives. Her knowledge of a child’s inner world, their milieu, culture and living suggests a teacher’s work is mostly out of the classroom. In the classroom, the teacher brings all this understanding to facilitate the child to channelise her creativity.
However, what is of concern is the kind of social vision that is reflected in her book for the Maori people. It seems from the book, that she is merely helping them transition from their culture to the ‘mainstream’ dominant European cultural paradigm. There seems to be no vision of what the role of education is for the children when the community is faced with the growing influence of a largely western conception of modernity. Is it just to let the Maori children make a painless smooth transition into this way of life – as the author seems to suggest? It makes one wonder if all of this is just to have a vibrant, culturally distinct and rich social group transition to and conform and fit into a homogenous social order that is largely a western definition? Her view that the ‘browns and the whites’ can never mix – is rather disturbing. Perhaps the book does not allow one to come to any conclusion on her views on the political and social implications of education but what comes out as her vision of the kind of social order that education should attempt to build, from the accounts in the book, are very narrow and limited.
Conclusion
The book, without actually building a theoretical frame or even referring to any, very powerfully speaks for constructivism. Especially, in language learning. It makes one put down all the charts, worksheets aside for a moment and look at the child, her energies, interests, excitements and remind oneself how important, rich and valuable resource these can be.
Except for the tinge of sentimentality and the sometimes-desultory organisation the book is a worthwhile read for teachers and an interesting peek into the wonderful life of Maori children.
And finally, for a person who is a reluctant teacher and who is apprehensive about this forced career choice coming in the way of her more desired creative pursuits, teaching only enriched Warner’s equally celebrated literary and creative work. This should go towards removing the rather prosaic image of teaching as a routine, unimaginative profession.
Reference
http://www.bookcouncil.org.nz/writers/ashtonwarner.html

A Prayer for difficult times